← All articles

Using Immich as a Google Photos or iCloud replacement

The cost and privacy gains can be worthwhile. They are earned by running the server, protecting the backups, and testing the move before deleting the old library.

Immich is attractive when a person or family wants control of photos and videos without paying a larger cloud tier forever. The trade is simple to describe but easy to underestimate. You exchange part of the provider's convenience for your own hardware, storage, backups, updates, and recovery work.

The move starts with the archive

Export the original library before changing anything. Google Photos users may use Google Takeout and an import tool. iCloud users need to check how originals, edits, albums, dates, and shared items export. Expect duplicates, sidecar files, missing metadata, and long upload times. Keep the source until the new library is checked.

Daily convenience is the real test

A replacement has to work when a phone is nearly full, when the screen is locked, when the home network is away, and when another family member wants to find an old photo. Test background upload, battery use, search, albums, sharing links, account recovery, and a new phone before switching off the old service.

The privacy gain is conditional

Keeping the library on your own system can reduce the amount of information held by a consumer cloud provider. The files can still leak through remote access, shared links, stolen devices, weak passwords, or an unprotected backup. Use separate admin access, strong authentication, updates, and an off-site copy.

Compare five years, not one month

Count hardware, disks, power, replacement parts, backup storage, setup time, updates, and your own support time. Compare that with the cloud tier you would actually buy. Then give a value to control and privacy without pretending they are a guaranteed dollar saving.

A useful next step

Use the Immich cost and privacy calculator →

Sources